Student Affairs HomePrograms & ServicesNews & Info.Application FormsSite MapRelated LinksSearch
 


  

I. University Policy Regarding Sexual Harassment

"It is the policy of the State of California to afford all persons, regardless of their sex, equal rights and opportunities in the educational institutions of the state." (Education Code, Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 200, 1996). "Sexual harassment of students is a form of sexual discrimination," which is prohibited by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. [Sexual Harassment Guidance Harassment of Students by School Employees, other students, or Third Parties. Office for Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education. March 1997]

Consistent with Federal Law and California policy, California State University, Fresno is firmly committed to maintaining a learning and working environment that is characterized by integrity and ethical behavior on the part of its students and employees. Sexual harassment is prohibited by State and CSU system policy (see Appendices A & B) and is contrary to the educational mission and behavioral expectations of the university. It damages the careers, educational experience and well-being of students, faculty and staff; undermines the respect students and the community have for the university. and tarnishes the credibility of the university as an institution of higher learning.

As a matter of policy and practice, sexual harassment is regarded by California State University, Fresno as discriminatory behavior which will not be permitted or condoned. It is not only unprofessional conduct, it violates campus policy (See Appendix A: CSU Executive Order No. 345, 1981;) and the State mandated Education Code (Chapter 2, 1996; See Appendix B), and the OCR Sexual Harassment Guidance (See Appendix D). [Note: OCR defers to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Guidance regarding sexual harassment of faculty members and other university employees.]

While sexual harassment Is particularly egregious in situations of a power differential between the persons involved, the university also recognizes that sexual harassment may occur between persons of the same status and between persons of the same sex. Sexual harassment in any of these forms violates standards of both professional and personal responsibility.

All members of the campus community including students, faculty, staff, administrators and those who apply to be students, employees, contractors and vendors should be aware that California State University. Fresno (hereafter referred to as the university) will not tolerate behavior between or among members of the university community which constitutes sexual harassment and action will be taken to eliminate sexual harassment. Any form of sexual harassment is conduct subject to personnel action (including reprimand or disciplinary action). Cases concerning individuals not subject to university policy and subject to state laws will be referred to the appropriate state and federal agencies.

Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom

It is recognized that legitimate political, social, ed~lcat~onal, religious or artistic expression is protected by the First Amendment and no speech or expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment shall be deemed to be sexual harassment

Generally, within an academic setting, speech or expressive conduct that is relevant to course content or a matter of public concern would be protected by academic freedom. For example, it might be appropriate to address sexual themes in some class situations, but not others. If a faculty member uses sexually-charged language to illustrate points in a course that bears no relationship to sex, the speech would not be protected.

To be protected, speech or conduct must be intended to advance the learning process. The law does not protect students from all discomfort. But neither the First Amendment nor academic freedom will protect sexual propositions, demands for sexual favors, or irrelevant and offensive speech that is directed at a student because of his or her gender, regardless of where such speech occurs - whether in the classroom. the faculty member's office, or elsewhere.

II. Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment

The California Education Code (Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 212.5, 1996) defines "Sexual Harassment" as follows

Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature made by someone from or in the work or educational setting under any of the following conditions:

(a) Submission to the conduct is explicitly or implicitly made a term or a condition of an individual's employment, academic status, or progress.

(b) Submission to, or rejection of, the conduct by the individual is used as the basis of employment or academic decisions affecting the individual.

(c) The conduct has the purpose or effect of having a negative impact upon the individual's work or academic performance, or of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work or educational environment.

(d) Submission to, or rejection of, the conduct by the individual is used as the basis for any decision affecting the individual regarding benefits and services, honors, programs, or activities available at or through the educational institution.

Within this definition two distinct categories of sexual harassment claims are generally recognized:

(I ) Quid Pro Quo; and

(2) Hostile Environment

Quid Pro Quo

Within the university, "Quid Pro Quo" harassment occurs when submission to sexual conduct is made either an explicit or implicit condition of employment benefits or admission, financial aid, academic evaluation or any other identifiable educational benefit, and submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions or decisions concerning admission, financial aid, academic evaluation or any other educational decisions affecting such individual.

Hostile Environment

Within the university, "Hostile Environment" sexual harassment exists when unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature occurs; where such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with a reasonable individual's work or educational performance or creating an intimidating hostile or offensive working or learning environment

III. Examples of Sexual Harassment Behavior

  • Unwanted sexual advances or propositions.

  • Offering employment benefits in exchange for sexual favors.

  • Making or threatening reprisals after a negative response to sexual advances.

  • Intentional unwanted physical conduct (touching, patting, hugging, or brushing against a person's body, impeding or blocking  movement, assault).

  • Visual conduct: Leering, making sexual gestures, displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons or posters.

  • Verbal conduct: Making or using derogatory comments, epithets, slurs, jokes, verbal abuse of a sexual nature, graphic verbal commentaries about an individual's body, sexually degrading words used to describe an individual, suggestive or obscene letters, notes or invitations, sexually explicit statements, questions, or anecdotes. (Based on California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Division 4, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2)

Any one of the above mentioned types of behavior may constitute sexual harassment in an aggravated situation, however, "Hostile Environment" sexual harassment usually requires a continuous, severe and pervasive "course of conduct" encompassing more than one incident of the examples identified above. Although one incident might not constitute sexual harassment, it may nevertheless be unprofessional and inappropriate conduct in the workplace for which the university may take personnel action (including reprimand or disciplinary action).

IV. Procedures Addressing Student Respondents*

This policy addresses those situations where the complainant is student, faculty, staff or administrator and the respondent is faculty, staff, administrator or other member of the campus community. When the respondent is a student, the case will be handled by the Dean of Students and the actions of the university will be governed instead by CSU Executive Order No. 628 which is consistent with that portion of Title 5 that addresses student discipline at California State Universities (Chapter 1, Subchapter 4, Article 2, Sections 41301 and 41304, 1996). Specifically, "any student on a campus may be expelled, suspended, placed on probation or given a lesser sanction for . . . the following causes which must be campus related:

(e) physical abuse, on or off campus property, of the person or property of any member of the campus community or of members of his or her family or the threat of such abuse;

(k) abusive behavior directed toward, or hazing of, a member of the campus community.''

The term "member of the campus community" is defined as meaning CSU Trustees, academic, non-academic and administrative personnel, students and other persons while such other persons are on campus property or at a campus function.

The term "campus property" includes:

(a) real or personal property in the possession of, or under the control of, the Board of Trustees of the CSU, and

(b) all campus feeding, retail or residence facilities whether operated by a campus or by a campus auxiliary organization

V. Filing a Complaint

Any student, faculty, staff, administrator or other member of the campus community who feels he or she has been involved in an incident of sexual harassment may file a complaint with the Director of Human Resources by contacting 278-2364 and reporting orally or in writing.

Employees who are represented by collective bargaining agreements may elect to follow procedures outlined in their respective agreement. The chief stewards of Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 may be consulted regarding the specific policies and procedures governing issues related to sexual harassment. Human Resources can provide the names and telephone numbers of the campus chief stewards.

* The respondent is the person against whom a complaint has been filed. The complainant is the person filing the complaint.

Employees who are not represented by collective bargaining agreements and faculty (Unit 3) have recourse through Executive Order No. 419 of the Chancellor's Office, "Systemwide Grievance Procedure - Discrimination Complaints for Employees NOW Covered by Existing Regulations."

Human Resources can provide copies of these grievance procedures.

Any reprisal against individuals who use any of the above mentioned procedures is a violation of university policy and could result in personnel action (including reprimand or disciplinary action). Any type of retaliation for lodging or participating in a complaint or investigation of sexual harassment is strictly prohibited. Additionally, retaliation for objecting to sexually harassing behavior is also prohibited and allegations of such retaliation may be filed under these procedures as well.

Time Frame for Receiving a Complaint

The standard for timeliness is that a complaint be received within one ( 1 ) year of the time that the alleged event(s) occurred. Complainants should understand that as time passes, assessment becomes more difficult.. It is understood by the university, however, that the stress and fear that individuals who are subjected to sexual harassment may experience often complicate the decision to make a complaint. However, the university will investigate all complaints whenever they are brought forward. This provision is not intended to extend the statute of limitations that is provided by law.

VI. Reporting Allegations of Sexual Harassment

Informal Consultation About Alleged Incidents

There are many individuals with whom the complainant may discuss alleged incidents of sexual harassment prior to making a formal report to the university. These individuals include students, faculty, staff and department chairs (or any other lead supervisors). Satisfactory informal resolution of the matter may result from such consultation.

However, once the allegation is brought to the attention of a dean or other Management Personnel Plan (MPP) employee by anyone, it is the responsibility of that dean or MPP employee to report the situation to the Director of Human Resources (designee of the Vice President for Administration) for further investigation. As authorized agents of the university, deans and MPP employees are required to take action. Exceptions may include those whose primary responsibilities are as licensed counselors with, for example, the University Health and Counseling Center or the Employee Assistance Program.

Formal Action Required of MPP Employees

Deans and MPP employees shall submit a written report explaining the substance of any alleged incident to the Director of Human Resources, or designee, within a reasonable period of time which is usually five (5) university working days.

In addition, members of the university community have the right to file a formal complaint at any time within the appropriate time limits. As noted in Section V, Filing a Complaint, different procedures may apply to employees in bargaining units and management employees not covered by bargaining units. The Vice President for Administration (or designee) is responsible for reporting to external agencies all allegations of sexual harassment for the university and for biannual reports to the President summarizing the number and nature of the complaints and their resolution or disposition. Human Resources will log and track all cases of sexual harassment.

Those cases involving a student respondent will be referred to the Dean of Students, those involving a faculty respondent will be referred to the Associate Vice President for Academic Personnel and all others will be referred to the Affirmative Action Officer. In some situations, referral may vary.

VII Complaint Investigation and Mediation Procedures

The university will investigate and act upon complaints with an emphasis on mediating an agreement between the complainant and respondent if the parties agree to do so. The complainant has the right to end the informal mediation process at any time and begin the formal stage of the complaint process. In some cases, such as alleged sexual assaults, mediation will not be appropriate even on a voluntary basis. If an agreement cannot be reached, a recommendation will be made to the President (or designee).

Investigator and Mediator Pool

The President shall appoint eight (8) people to be available for investigation and/or mediation in addition to the Affirmative Action Officer, Dean of Students and Associate Vice President for Academic Personnel. These eight (8) will include:

four (4) faculty, and
four (4) staff (including two (2) Student Services personnel).

These eight (8) people will reflect a balance of gender, cultural and age diversity and they will serve three-year staggered terms. They will rely on discreet inquiry, persuasion and trust in addressing complaints. As mediators, they will emphasize conciliation and resolution.

Human Resources shall be responsible for ensuring that all people serving as investigators or mediators receive appropriate training.

Selection of Investigator(s) and/or Mediator for Assessment Team

Once a case has been referred to the appropriate principal investigator that individual may select an investigator/mediator from among the eight (8) appointed by the President to assist with or conduct the investigation and mediation. This is referred to hereafter as the Assessment Team. It should be noted that in those cases where the respondent is a student, Student Discipline Procedures (Executive Order No. 628) supersede Section VII of the present policy.

Initial Hearing of Complaint: Explanation of Policy and Options

The complainant (individual bringing the complaint) will be given a copy of the university's "Policy and Procedures Addressing Sexual Harassment" and will be provided a safe setting in which the problem can be discussed impartially and with discretion with the Assessment Team.

It will be explained to the complainant that the university is strongly committed and legally required to ensure that a campus environment free from sexual harassment be maintained.

Although the university will make every effort to resolve sexual harassment complaints in a sensitive, discreet manner, the complainant will be informed that once the university is made aware of a sexual harassment charge, it is legally required to proceed to investigate and take all reasonably necessary steps to eliminate and deter further sexual harassment conduct even if the complainant decides at some point not to pursue the matter.

It will be explained that the university, depending on the nature of the charge, cannot guarantee confidentiality. It will also be explained that discussing the matter with individuals whose professional license requires professional-client confidentiality may not guarantee confidentiality, as the privilege of confidentiality for psychotherapists arises under California state law and may not be recognized in a federal court lawsuit.

The complainant will be encouraged to submit a signed written statement with detailed descriptions of events, including as much detail as possible (e.g. dates, time, location, actions, circumstances and any witnesses.)

Time Frame for Resolution of Complaint

Prompt and equitable resolution of sexual harassment complaints are to be sought. There shall be resolution of a complaint (if resolution is possible) within a reasonable period of time which is usually forty-five (45) university working days of the filing of the complaint unless this time limit is extended by mutual agreement of the complainant and the Assessment Team. In cases where normal university break periods prevent timely resolution, the principal investigator shall inform all parties in writing that the time period will be extended as needed.

Notification of Respondent and Complainant

The Director of Human Resources will send to the respondent and the complainant a letter of notification indicating a complaint is being investigated, the date on which the investigation will be completed (i.e., forty-five (45) working days from receipt of the complaint), a copy of the university's Policy and Procedures Addressing Sexual Harassment and a statement that provides an explanation of options available to the respondent (e.g. right of representation) and consequences that may follow. Cases involving administrators will be referred to the appropriate Vice President, the President, or the Chancellor's Office. Complainants and respondents will be notified by the Vice President, the President or the Chancellor's designee.

Responsibilities and Role of the Assessment Team

If a signed written complaint has not been received from the complainant, the Assessment Team shall ask the complainant to describe the incident(s) in detail that has/have given rise to the complaint. It is the responsibility of the team to coordinate with the grade protest committee when complaints involve"mixed motives".

The Assessment Team will determine:

  • if the complainant has university status (student? employee, etc.);
  • if the alleged conduct violates university policy on sexual harassment;
  • if the complaint is timely;
  • if, by a preponderance of evidence*, the alleged act occurred;
  • and will evaluate the situation as to such issues as (examples, not exhaustive):
  • Whether the incident(s) was/were appropriate or inappropriate for the time, place and people involved.
  • What was inappropriate?
  • Whether there was any unwanted physical contact.
  • Reaction to the incident.
  • Whether it was possible to indicate that the behavior was unwanted and offensive.
  • Effects of incident on complainant.
  • Statements by any witnesses to the alleged incident.
  • Evidence about the relative credibility of the complainant and the respondent.

* See Black's Law Dictionary for complete definition

Role of Assessment Team

If the Assessment Team determines that a timely complaint of sexual harassment has been received from a member of the university community, the Team will:

  • encourage the complainant to submit a written statement of the allegations, including all of the relevant details and the remedy that he/she feels is appropriate;
  • inform, in writing, the respondent of the complaint of the allegations and the remedy desired by the complainant;
  • request a meeting with the respondent;
  • inform the respondent of right to submit to the principal investigator a written response to the allegations;
  • determine if resolution of the alleged conduct is appropriate for mediation,
  • determine if there are individuals with direct information regarding the issue; and, interview them;
  • determine the existence of any other evidence, including but not limited to documentary evidence;
  • evaluate all evidence collected and determine by a preponderance of that evidence whether sexual harassment occurred.

Role of Mediator

  • attempt to resolve informally issues between the complainant and the respondent of the complaint if mutually agreeable; and

  • recommend measures to both parties to resolve the complaint.

Complaints Found to Be Without Merit

If, at the end of its review, the Assessment Team finds the complaint to be without merit, it will so inform the Director of Human Resources who will inform the complainant, the respondent of the complaint, and the President in writing. Additionally, the complainant will be informed in writing of the basis upon which the complaint was found to be without merit. All records related to the complaint shall be kept in Human Resources for four (4) years. At the end of four (4) years, the contents of this record shall be destroyed, unless a new complaint against the same individual has been received. If the complainant disagrees with the decision made by the Assessment Team, the complainant should be reminded of information given initially to herA~im regarding other available options, including the right to request reconsideration following the President's decision (see page 12).

Resolution of Complaint

The Assessment Team Mediator shall prepare a resolution for the review of the complainant, the respondent of the complaint and the principal investigator. If the resolution is found to be reasonable and acceptable to both the complainant and the respondent of the complaint, the resolution shall be given to the Director of Human Resources who will communicate in writing to the complainant, the respondent of the complaint, and the President. A file containing this resolution and all documents pertaining to the complaint shall be kept in Human Resources for four (4) years.

At the end of four (4) years, the contents of this record, including the resolution, the President's copy (including the original notification) and all notes and documents pertaining to the complaint shall be destroyed, unless a new complaint against the same individual has been received.

If a new complaint against the same individual has been received and the Assessment Team finds that the new complaint has merit or that the respondent of the complaint has failed to comply with the terms of the resolution reached for the original complaint, the four (4) year period will begin again and all documents will be retained in Human Resources.

In The Event of No Mediated Resolution of Complaint

If there is no mediated resolution of a complaint, the President shall be notified in writing by the Director of Human Resources that the attempt to find a resolution that is mutually agreeable between the complainant and respondent was unsuccessful. The written report will include:

  • findings of fact on each allegation of the complaint,
  • a conclusion based upon a preponderance of evidence as to whether the sexual harassment policy has been violated, and
  • a recommendation as to the administrative and/or personnel action(including reprimand or disciplinary action), if any, that should be taken.

A copy of the notification to the President, in addition to all relevant documents, will be kept in the file maintained by Human Resources. This file shall be kept in Human Resources for four (4) years, at which time the contents including all written notifications to the President shall be destroyed, unless a new complaint against the same individual has been received. If a new complaint against the same individual has been received and the Assessment Team finds that the new complaint has merit, the four (4) year period will begin again and all documents will be retained in Human Resources.

Decision of President or Designee Regarding Investigation Report

Within a reasonable period of time which is usually fifteen (15) university working days of receipt of the report, the President or designee shall issue a written decision either sustaining or rejecting the report. The President or designee may seek additional information as necessary during this time.

  • If the complaint was found to have merit, the President or designee shall so notify the complainant in writing and provide the decision, the basis for it and the nature of the corrective actions and shall communicate in writing with the respondent and appropriate department/area manager the action that will be taken by the university which may include a grade change.

  • If the President or designee determines that the complaint has no merit, the complainant and respondent will be so notified.. The complainant will be advised of the right to request reconsideration by the President based upon newly discovered material information not previously presented and which with reasonable diligence could not have been presented during the original investigation.

Request for Reconsideration

If a complainant is not satisfied with the outcome of the complaint process described above, he/she may file a written request for reconsideration with the President within ten (10) University working days of receipt of the President's decision. The appeal shall summarize the newly discovered information upon which the complainant believes the appeal should be granted.

The President will acknowledge receipt of the appeal within a reasonable period of time which is usually five (5) university working days and will, within a reasonable period of time which is usually twenty (20) university working days, provide a written decision to the complainant and respondent. The President within this time period may decide to review some or all of the evidence presented in the original investigation and/or require further investigation into the matter. If the President exercises the discretion under this provision to either review some or all evidence presented in the original investigation or to require further investigation both the complainant and the respondent shall be notified. The President's decision is the final university decision.

A respondent may appeal a personnel action (i.e., reprimand or disciplinary action) under the policies and procedures of the collective bargaining agreement of the appropriate employee unit.

VIII. Educational Plan to inform Campus Community of Sexual Harassment Policy

A proactive program will be maintained to educate all university community members as to the definition of sexual harassment, the university's policy concerning it, and what recourse a complainant has to remedy the situation.

Appropriate printed materials written for specific groups, e.g., faculty, staff, students and managers will be published and readily accessible in the administration buildings, student dormitories, Campus Police Office, Women's Resource Center and athletic facilities. All new employees and students will be provided a copy of this policy. Printed material will include: the university's definition of sexual harassment; a strong statement that such behavior is illegal, unprofessional and will not be tolerated; and the procedures for reporting charges of sexual harassment. Information on sexual harassment will also be maintained in existing publications such as the Genera1 Catalogue and the Schedule of Courses.

A student Sexual Harassment Awareness program will be developed by the Dean of Students to promote a harassment free learning environment. Orientation programs for all new students and all new employees shall include coverage of the university's policy and procedures addressing sexual harassment.

Annually all managers and department chairs will be required to attend workshops on sexual harassment or attend a lecture on the subject at a regularly scheduled meeting.

In an effort to establish the effectiveness of the university's efforts to act upon complaints of sexual harassment, Human Resources will maintain and make available statistics with regard to the number of complaints received and their disposition or outcome.

IX. On and Off Campus Resources

The. following is a list of resources for individuals who feel they have experienced sexual harassment or been accused of harassment:

1)     On campus help is available for complainants as well as respondents as follows:
        Students: Health/Counseling Services, X2734
        All Others: Employee Assistance and Development, X4357
        General Information: Affirmative Action Office, X2032
        Filing Complaints:   Director of Human Resources, X2364

2)     Department of Fair Employment and Housing
        1900 Mariposa Mall
        Fresno, CA 93703
        (800) 884-1684 - TDD (916) 324-1678
        8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday

This is the state government entity that is charged with investigating sexual harassment and other forms of work place discrimination.

3)     Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
        1265 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 10
        Fresno, CA 93710
        (209) 487-5793
        8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday

This is the federal government entity that is charged with investigating complaints of discrimination in the work place.

4)     HELP NOW
        P.O. Box 1232
        Fresno, CA 93715
        Call: HELP NOW [(209) 435-7669], open 24 hours

This service is part of Community Hospitals of Central California and offers crisis intervention and referral information.

5)     U.S. Department of Education
        Office of Civil Rights (OCR)
        Old Federal Building-Room 239
        San Francisco, California 94102
        Regional Director: Stefan M. Rosenberg
        Phone: (415) 437-7700
        Fax: (415) 437-7783

OCR has the responsibility under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) to ensure that recipients of Federal financial assistance through the U. S. Department of Education do not discriminate against persons participating in its programs and activities on the basis of sex. Fresno State receives Federal funds through the Department; therefore, OCR has jurisdiction over a complaint.

6)     Rape Counseling Services
        1060 Fulton Mall
        Fresno, CA 93728
        Business: (209) 497-2900
        24-hour hotline: (209) 222-RAPE

This organization provides crisis intervention and short- and long-term therapy for victims

7)    Attorney's Information and Referral Service
        2014 Tulare Street, Room 420
        Fresno, CA 93721
        (209) 264-0137

This service provides referral to a lawyer for $15. This pays for a i/: hour consultation.

8)     Therapist Referral Network
        1 -800-THERARAPIST

This service provides referrals to local therapists for mental health counseling.

9)    Victim-Witness Service Center
        Fresno County Plaza, 11 th Floor
        Fresno, CA 93721
        (209) 488-3425
        8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday

This service provides support, crisis intervention and help in managing the court system.