| 
I. University Policy
Regarding Sexual Harassment
"It is the policy of the State of California
to afford all persons, regardless of their sex, equal rights and opportunities in the
educational institutions of the state." (Education Code, Chapter 2, Article 1,
Section 200, 1996). "Sexual harassment of students is a form of sexual
discrimination," which is prohibited by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
[Sexual Harassment Guidance Harassment of Students by School Employees, other students, or
Third Parties. Office for Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education. March 1997]
Consistent with Federal Law and
California policy, California State University, Fresno is firmly committed to maintaining
a learning and working environment that is characterized by integrity and ethical behavior
on the part of its students and employees. Sexual harassment is prohibited by State and
CSU system policy (see Appendices A & B) and is contrary to the educational mission
and behavioral expectations of the university. It damages the careers, educational
experience and well-being of students, faculty and staff; undermines the respect students
and the community have for the university. and tarnishes the credibility of the university
as an institution of higher learning.
As a matter of policy and practice, sexual harassment is regarded by
California State University, Fresno as discriminatory behavior which will not be permitted
or condoned. It is not only unprofessional conduct, it violates campus policy (See
Appendix A: CSU Executive Order No. 345, 1981;) and the State mandated Education Code
(Chapter 2, 1996; See Appendix B), and the OCR Sexual Harassment Guidance (See Appendix
D). [Note: OCR defers to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Guidance
regarding sexual harassment of faculty members and other university employees.]
While sexual harassment Is particularly egregious in situations of a
power differential between the persons involved, the university also recognizes that
sexual harassment may occur between persons of the same status and between persons of the
same sex. Sexual harassment in any of these forms violates standards of both professional
and personal responsibility.
All members of the campus community including students, faculty, staff,
administrators and those who apply to be students, employees, contractors and vendors
should be aware that California State University. Fresno (hereafter referred to as the
university) will not tolerate behavior between or among members of the university
community which constitutes sexual harassment and action will be taken to eliminate sexual
harassment. Any form of sexual harassment is conduct subject to personnel action
(including reprimand or disciplinary action). Cases concerning individuals not subject to
university policy and subject to state laws will be referred to the appropriate state and
federal agencies.
Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom
It is recognized that legitimate political, social,
ed~lcat~onal, religious or artistic expression is protected by the First Amendment and no speech or expressive conduct protected by the First
Amendment shall be deemed to be sexual harassment
Generally, within an academic setting, speech or expressive conduct
that is relevant to course content or a matter of public concern would be protected by
academic freedom. For example, it might be appropriate to address sexual themes in some
class situations, but not others. If a faculty member uses sexually-charged language to
illustrate points in a course that bears no relationship to sex, the speech would not be
protected.
To be protected, speech or conduct must be intended to advance the
learning process. The law does not protect students from all discomfort. But neither the
First Amendment nor academic freedom will protect sexual propositions, demands for sexual
favors, or irrelevant and offensive speech that is directed at a student because of his or
her gender, regardless of where such speech occurs - whether in the classroom. the faculty
member's office, or elsewhere.
II. Legal
Definition of Sexual Harassment
The California Education Code (Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 212.5,
1996) defines "Sexual Harassment" as follows
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other
verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature made by someone from or in the work
or educational setting under any of the following conditions:
(a) Submission to the conduct is explicitly or implicitly made a term
or a condition of an individual's employment, academic status, or progress.
(b) Submission to, or rejection of, the conduct by the individual is
used as the basis of employment or academic decisions affecting the individual.
(c) The conduct has the purpose or effect of having a negative impact
upon the individual's work or academic performance, or of creating an intimidating,
hostile, or offensive work or educational environment.
(d) Submission to, or rejection of, the conduct by the individual is
used as the basis for any decision affecting the individual regarding benefits and
services, honors, programs, or activities available at or through the educational
institution.
Within this definition two distinct categories of sexual harassment claims are
generally recognized:
(I ) Quid Pro Quo; and
(2) Hostile Environment
Quid
Pro Quo
Within the university, "Quid Pro Quo" harassment occurs when
submission to sexual conduct is made either an explicit or implicit condition of
employment benefits or admission, financial aid, academic evaluation or any other
identifiable educational benefit, and submission to or rejection of such conduct by an
individual is used as the basis for employment decisions or decisions concerning
admission, financial aid, academic evaluation or any other educational decisions affecting
such individual.
Hostile Environment
Within the university, "Hostile Environment" sexual
harassment exists when unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other
verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature occurs; where such conduct has the purpose
or effect of unreasonably interfering with a reasonable individual's work or educational
performance or creating an intimidating hostile or offensive working or learning
environment
III. Examples of Sexual Harassment Behavior
Unwanted sexual advances or
propositions.
Offering employment benefits in
exchange for sexual favors.
Making or threatening reprisals
after a negative response to sexual advances.
Intentional unwanted physical
conduct (touching, patting, hugging, or brushing against a person's body, impeding or
blocking movement, assault).
Visual conduct: Leering, making
sexual gestures, displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons or posters.
Verbal conduct: Making or using
derogatory comments, epithets, slurs, jokes, verbal abuse of a sexual nature, graphic
verbal commentaries about an individual's body, sexually degrading words used to describe
an individual, suggestive or obscene letters, notes or invitations, sexually explicit
statements, questions, or anecdotes. (Based on California Code of Regulations, Title 2,
Division 4, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2)
Any one of the above mentioned
types of behavior may constitute sexual harassment in an aggravated situation, however,
"Hostile Environment" sexual harassment usually requires a continuous, severe
and pervasive "course of conduct" encompassing more than one incident of the
examples identified above. Although one incident might not constitute sexual harassment,
it may nevertheless be unprofessional and inappropriate conduct in the workplace for which
the university may take personnel action (including reprimand or disciplinary action).
IV. Procedures Addressing Student Respondents*
This policy addresses those situations where the complainant is
student, faculty, staff or administrator and the respondent is faculty, staff,
administrator or other member of the campus community. When the respondent is a student,
the case will be handled by the Dean of Students and the actions of the university will be
governed instead by CSU Executive Order No. 628 which is consistent with that portion of
Title 5 that addresses student discipline at California State Universities (Chapter 1,
Subchapter 4, Article 2, Sections 41301 and 41304, 1996). Specifically, "any student
on a campus may be expelled, suspended, placed on probation or given a lesser sanction for
. . . the following causes which must be campus related:
(e) physical abuse, on or off campus property, of the person or property of any member
of the campus community or of members of his or her family or the threat of such abuse;
(k) abusive behavior directed toward, or hazing of, a member of the campus community.''
The term "member of the campus community" is defined as
meaning CSU Trustees, academic, non-academic and administrative personnel, students and
other persons while such other persons are on campus property or at a campus function.
The term "campus property" includes:
(a) real or personal property in the possession of, or under the
control of, the Board of Trustees of the CSU, and
(b) all campus feeding, retail or residence facilities whether operated
by a campus or by a campus auxiliary organization
V. Filing a Complaint
Any student, faculty, staff, administrator or other member of the
campus community who feels he or she has been involved in an incident of sexual harassment
may file a complaint with the Director of Human Resources by contacting 278-2364 and
reporting orally or in writing.
Employees who are represented by collective bargaining agreements may
elect to follow procedures outlined in their respective agreement. The chief stewards of
Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 may be consulted regarding the specific policies and
procedures governing issues related to sexual harassment. Human Resources can provide the
names and telephone numbers of the campus chief stewards.
* The
respondent is the person against whom a complaint has been filed. The complainant is the
person filing the complaint.
Employees who are not represented by collective bargaining agreements
and faculty (Unit 3) have recourse through Executive Order No. 419 of the Chancellor's
Office, "Systemwide Grievance Procedure - Discrimination Complaints for Employees NOW Covered by Existing Regulations."
Human Resources can provide copies of these grievance procedures.
Any reprisal against individuals who use any of the above mentioned
procedures is a violation of university policy and could result in personnel action
(including reprimand or disciplinary action). Any type of retaliation for lodging or
participating in a complaint or investigation of sexual harassment is strictly prohibited.
Additionally, retaliation for objecting to sexually harassing behavior is also
prohibited and allegations of such retaliation may be filed under these procedures as
well.
Time Frame for Receiving a Complaint
The standard for timeliness is that a complaint be received within one
( 1 ) year of the time that the alleged event(s) occurred. Complainants should understand
that as time passes, assessment becomes more difficult.. It is understood by the
university, however, that the stress and fear that individuals who are subjected to sexual
harassment may experience often complicate the decision to make a complaint. However, the
university will investigate all complaints whenever they are brought forward. This
provision is not intended to extend the statute of limitations that is provided by law.
VI. Reporting Allegations of Sexual Harassment
Informal Consultation About Alleged Incidents
There are many individuals with whom the complainant may discuss
alleged incidents of sexual harassment prior to making a formal report to the university.
These individuals include students, faculty, staff and department chairs (or any other
lead supervisors). Satisfactory informal resolution of the matter may result from such
consultation.
However, once the allegation is brought to the attention of a dean or
other Management Personnel Plan (MPP) employee by anyone, it is the responsibility of that
dean or MPP employee to report the situation to the Director of Human Resources
(designee of the Vice President for Administration) for further investigation. As
authorized agents of the university, deans and MPP employees are required to take action.
Exceptions may include those whose primary responsibilities are as licensed counselors
with, for example, the University Health and Counseling Center or the Employee
Assistance Program.
Formal Action Required of MPP Employees
Deans and MPP employees shall submit a written report explaining the
substance of any alleged incident to the Director of Human Resources, or designee, within
a reasonable period of time which is usually five (5) university working days.
In addition, members of the university community have the right to file
a formal complaint at any time within the appropriate time limits. As noted in Section V,
Filing a Complaint, different procedures may apply to employees in bargaining units and
management employees not covered by bargaining units. The Vice President for
Administration (or designee) is responsible for reporting to external agencies all
allegations of sexual harassment for the university and for biannual reports to the
President summarizing the number and nature of the complaints and their resolution or
disposition. Human Resources will log and track all cases of sexual harassment.
Those cases involving a student respondent will be referred to the Dean
of Students, those involving a faculty respondent will be referred to the Associate Vice
President for Academic Personnel and all others will be referred to the Affirmative Action
Officer. In some situations, referral may vary.
VII Complaint Investigation
and Mediation Procedures
The university will investigate and act upon complaints with an
emphasis on mediating an agreement between the complainant and respondent if the parties
agree to do so. The complainant has the right to end the informal mediation process at any
time and begin the formal stage of the complaint process. In some cases, such as alleged
sexual assaults, mediation will not be appropriate even on a voluntary basis. If an
agreement cannot be reached, a recommendation will be made to the President (or designee).
Investigator and Mediator Pool
The President shall appoint eight (8) people to be available for
investigation and/or mediation in addition to the Affirmative Action Officer, Dean of
Students and Associate Vice President for Academic Personnel. These eight (8) will
include:
four (4) faculty, and
four (4) staff (including two (2) Student Services personnel).
These eight (8) people will reflect a balance of gender, cultural and age diversity and
they will serve three-year staggered terms. They will rely on discreet inquiry, persuasion
and trust in addressing complaints. As mediators, they will emphasize conciliation and
resolution.
Human Resources shall be responsible for ensuring that all people serving as
investigators or mediators receive appropriate training.
Selection of Investigator(s) and/or Mediator for Assessment Team
Once a case has been referred to the appropriate principal investigator
that individual may select an investigator/mediator from among the eight (8) appointed by
the President to assist with or conduct the investigation and mediation. This is referred
to hereafter as the Assessment Team. It should be noted that in those cases where the
respondent is a student, Student
Discipline Procedures (Executive Order No. 628) supersede Section VII of the present
policy.
Initial Hearing of Complaint: Explanation of Policy and Options
The complainant (individual bringing the complaint) will be given a
copy of the university's "Policy and Procedures Addressing Sexual Harassment"
and will be provided a safe setting in which the problem can be discussed impartially and
with discretion with the Assessment Team.
It will be explained to the complainant that the university is strongly
committed and legally required to ensure that a campus environment free from sexual
harassment be maintained.
Although the university will make every effort to resolve sexual
harassment complaints in a sensitive, discreet manner, the complainant will be informed
that once the university is made aware of a sexual harassment charge, it is legally
required to proceed to investigate and take all reasonably necessary steps to eliminate
and deter further sexual harassment conduct even if the complainant decides at some point
not to pursue the matter.
It will be explained that the university, depending on the nature of
the charge, cannot guarantee confidentiality. It will also be explained that discussing
the matter with individuals whose professional license requires professional-client
confidentiality may not guarantee confidentiality, as the privilege of confidentiality for
psychotherapists arises under California state law and may not be recognized in a federal
court lawsuit.
The complainant will be encouraged to submit a signed written statement
with detailed descriptions of events, including as much detail as possible (e.g. dates,
time, location, actions, circumstances and any witnesses.)
Time Frame for Resolution of Complaint
Prompt and equitable resolution of sexual harassment complaints are to
be sought. There shall be resolution of a complaint (if resolution is possible) within a
reasonable period of time which is usually forty-five (45) university working days of the
filing of the complaint unless this time limit is extended by mutual agreement of the
complainant and the Assessment Team. In cases where normal university break periods
prevent timely resolution, the principal investigator shall inform all parties in writing
that the time period will be extended as needed.
Notification of Respondent and Complainant
The Director of Human Resources will send to the respondent and the complainant a
letter of notification indicating a complaint is being investigated, the date on which the
investigation will be completed (i.e., forty-five (45) working days from receipt of the
complaint), a copy of the university's Policy and Procedures Addressing Sexual Harassment
and a statement that provides an explanation of options available to the respondent (e.g.
right of representation) and consequences that may follow. Cases involving administrators
will be referred to the appropriate Vice President, the President, or the Chancellor's
Office. Complainants and respondents will be notified by the Vice President, the President
or the Chancellor's designee.
Responsibilities and Role of the Assessment Team
If a signed written complaint has not been received from the complainant, the
Assessment Team shall ask the complainant to describe the incident(s) in detail that
has/have given rise to the complaint. It is the responsibility of the team to coordinate
with the grade protest committee when complaints involve"mixed motives".
The Assessment Team will determine:
- if the complainant has university status (student? employee, etc.);
- if the alleged conduct violates university policy on sexual harassment;
- if the complaint is timely;
- if, by a preponderance of evidence*, the alleged act occurred;
- and will evaluate the situation as to such issues as (examples, not exhaustive):
- Whether the incident(s) was/were appropriate or inappropriate for the time, place and
people involved.
- What was inappropriate?
- Whether there was any unwanted physical contact.
- Reaction to the incident.
- Whether it was possible to indicate that the behavior was unwanted and offensive.
- Effects of incident on complainant.
- Statements by any witnesses to the alleged incident.
- Evidence about the relative credibility of the complainant and the respondent.
* See Black's Law Dictionary for complete definition
Role of Assessment Team
If the Assessment Team determines that a timely complaint of sexual harassment has been
received from a member of the university community, the Team will:
- encourage the complainant to submit a written statement of the allegations, including
all of the relevant details and the remedy that he/she feels is appropriate;
- inform, in writing, the respondent of the complaint of the
allegations and the remedy desired by the complainant;
- request a meeting with the respondent;
- inform the respondent of right to submit to the principal
investigator a written response to the allegations;
- determine if resolution of the alleged conduct is
appropriate for mediation,
- determine if there are individuals with direct information
regarding the issue; and, interview them;
- determine the existence of any other evidence, including
but not limited to documentary evidence;
- evaluate all evidence collected and determine by a
preponderance of that evidence whether sexual harassment occurred.
Role of Mediator
Complaints Found to Be Without Merit
If, at the end of its review, the Assessment Team finds the complaint
to be without merit, it will so inform the Director of Human Resources who will inform the
complainant, the respondent of the complaint, and the President in writing. Additionally,
the complainant will be informed in writing of the basis upon which the complaint was
found to be without merit. All records related to the complaint shall be kept in Human
Resources for four (4) years. At the end of four (4) years, the contents of this record
shall be destroyed, unless a new complaint against the same individual has been received.
If the complainant disagrees with the decision made by the Assessment Team, the
complainant should be reminded of information given initially to herA~im regarding other
available options, including the right to request reconsideration following the
President's decision (see page 12).
Resolution of Complaint
The Assessment Team Mediator shall prepare a resolution for the review
of the complainant, the respondent of the complaint and the principal investigator. If the
resolution is found to be reasonable and acceptable to both the complainant and the
respondent of the complaint, the resolution shall be given to the Director of Human
Resources who will communicate in writing to the complainant, the respondent of the
complaint, and the President. A file containing this resolution and all documents
pertaining to the complaint shall be kept in Human Resources for four (4) years.
At the end of four (4) years, the contents of this record, including
the resolution, the President's copy (including the original notification) and all notes
and documents pertaining to the complaint shall be destroyed, unless a new complaint
against the same individual has been received.
If a new complaint against the same individual has been received and the Assessment
Team finds that the new complaint has merit or that the respondent of the complaint has
failed to comply with the terms of the resolution reached for the original complaint, the
four (4) year period will begin again and all documents will be retained in Human
Resources.
In The Event of No
Mediated Resolution of Complaint
If there is no mediated resolution of a complaint, the President shall be notified in
writing by the Director of Human Resources that the attempt to find a resolution that is
mutually agreeable between the complainant and respondent was unsuccessful. The written
report will include:
- findings of fact on each allegation of the complaint,
- a conclusion based upon a preponderance of evidence as to whether the sexual harassment
policy has been violated, and
- a recommendation as to the administrative and/or personnel action(including reprimand or
disciplinary action), if any, that should be taken.
A copy of the notification to the President, in addition to all
relevant documents, will be kept in the file maintained by Human Resources. This file
shall be kept in Human Resources for four (4) years, at which time the contents including
all written notifications to the President shall be destroyed, unless a new complaint
against the same individual has been received. If a new complaint against the same
individual has been received and the Assessment Team finds that the new complaint has
merit, the four (4) year period will begin again and all documents will be retained in
Human Resources.
Decision of President
or Designee Regarding Investigation Report
Within a reasonable period of time which is usually fifteen (15)
university working days of receipt of the report, the President or designee shall issue a
written decision either sustaining or rejecting the report. The President or designee may
seek additional information as necessary during this time.
If the complaint was found to have merit, the President or designee
shall so notify the complainant in writing and provide the decision, the basis for it and
the nature of the corrective actions and shall communicate in writing with the respondent
and appropriate department/area manager the action that will be taken by the university
which may include a grade change.
If the President or designee determines that the complaint has no
merit, the complainant and respondent will be so notified.. The complainant will be
advised of the right to request reconsideration by the President based upon newly
discovered material information not previously presented and which with reasonable
diligence could not have been presented during the original investigation.
Request for Reconsideration
If a complainant is not satisfied with the outcome of the complaint
process described above, he/she may file a written request for reconsideration with the
President within ten (10) University working days of receipt of the President's
decision. The appeal shall summarize the newly discovered information upon
which the complainant believes the appeal should be granted.
The President will acknowledge receipt of the appeal within a
reasonable period of time which is usually five (5) university working days and will,
within a reasonable period of time which is usually twenty (20) university working days,
provide a written decision to the complainant and respondent. The President within this
time period may decide to review some or all of the evidence presented in the original
investigation and/or require further investigation into the matter. If the President
exercises the discretion under this provision to either review some or all evidence
presented in the original investigation or to require further investigation both the
complainant and the respondent shall be notified. The President's decision is the final
university decision.
A respondent may appeal a personnel action (i.e., reprimand or disciplinary action)
under the policies and procedures of the collective bargaining agreement of the
appropriate employee unit.
VIII. Educational Plan to inform Campus
Community of Sexual Harassment Policy
A proactive program will be maintained to educate all university
community members as to the definition of sexual harassment, the university's policy
concerning it, and what recourse a complainant has to remedy the situation.
Appropriate printed materials written for specific groups, e.g.,
faculty, staff, students and managers will be published and readily accessible in the
administration buildings, student dormitories, Campus Police Office, Women's Resource
Center and athletic facilities. All new employees and students will be provided a copy of
this policy. Printed material will include: the university's definition of sexual
harassment; a strong statement that such behavior is illegal, unprofessional and
will not be tolerated; and the procedures for reporting charges of sexual harassment.
Information on sexual harassment will also be maintained in existing publications such as
the Genera1 Catalogue and the Schedule of Courses.
A student Sexual Harassment Awareness program will be developed by the
Dean of Students to promote a harassment free learning environment. Orientation programs
for all new students and all new employees shall include coverage of the
university's policy and procedures addressing sexual harassment.
Annually all managers and department chairs will be required to attend
workshops on sexual harassment or attend a lecture on the subject at a regularly scheduled
meeting.
In an effort to establish the effectiveness of the university's efforts to act upon
complaints of sexual harassment, Human Resources will maintain and make available
statistics with regard to the number of complaints received and their disposition or
outcome.
IX. On and Off Campus Resources
The. following is a list of resources for individuals who feel they have experienced
sexual harassment or been accused of harassment:
1) On campus help is available for complainants as well as
respondents as follows:
Students: Health/Counseling
Services, X2734
All Others: Employee
Assistance and Development, X4357
General Information:
Affirmative Action Office, X2032
Filing Complaints:
Director of Human Resources, X2364
2) Department of Fair Employment and Housing
1900 Mariposa Mall
Fresno, CA 93703
(800) 884-1684 - TDD (916) 324-1678
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday
This is the state government entity that is charged with investigating sexual
harassment and other forms of work place discrimination.
3) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
1265 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 10
Fresno, CA 93710
(209) 487-5793
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday
This is the federal government entity that is charged with investigating complaints of
discrimination in the work place.
4) HELP NOW
P.O. Box 1232
Fresno, CA 93715
Call: HELP NOW [(209) 435-7669], open 24 hours
This service is part of Community Hospitals of Central California and offers crisis
intervention and referral information.
5) U.S.
Department of Education
Office of Civil Rights (OCR)
Old Federal Building-Room 239
San Francisco, California 94102
Regional Director: Stefan M. Rosenberg
Phone: (415) 437-7700
Fax: (415) 437-7783
OCR has the responsibility under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title
IX) to ensure that recipients of Federal financial assistance through the U. S. Department
of Education do not discriminate against persons participating in its programs and
activities on the basis of sex. Fresno State receives Federal funds through the
Department; therefore, OCR has jurisdiction over a complaint.
6) Rape Counseling Services
1060 Fulton Mall
Fresno, CA 93728
Business: (209) 497-2900
24-hour hotline: (209) 222-RAPE
This organization provides crisis intervention and short- and long-term therapy for
victims
7) Attorney's Information and Referral Service
2014 Tulare Street, Room 420
Fresno, CA 93721
(209) 264-0137
This service provides referral to a lawyer for $15. This pays for a i/: hour
consultation.
8) Therapist Referral Network
1 -800-THERARAPIST
This service provides referrals to local therapists for mental health counseling.
9) Victim-Witness Service Center
Fresno County Plaza, 11 th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721
(209) 488-3425
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday
This service provides support, crisis intervention and help in managing the court
system. |